<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TV Jots &#187; Summer 2006</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tvjots.com/tag/summer-2006/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tvjots.com</link>
	<description>All About Television</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 00:34:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>&#8216;Scrubs&#8217; Fans, Rejoice!</title>
		<link>http://tvjots.com/scrubs-fans-rejoice/</link>
		<comments>http://tvjots.com/scrubs-fans-rejoice/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 18:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chandra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Scrubs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Comedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer 2006]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Syndicated]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvjots.com/wordpress/scrubs-fans-rejoice/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Laughs Check In, But They Don&#8217;t Check Out In case you didn&#8217;t know, basic cable&#8217;s Comedy Central acquired the rights to air NBC&#8217;s hilarious and still very-much-alive sitcom Scrubs. Already renewed for a sixth season, currently slated to begin in 2007, on the alphabetical network, the half-hour ensemble follows the misadventures of assorted medical [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fullpost">
<h4>The Laughs Check In, But They Don&#8217;t Check Out</h4>

<p><img class="left" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger2/8071/3646/200/scrubs.jpg" alt="Scrubs" />
In case you didn&#8217;t know, basic cable&#8217;s Comedy Central acquired the rights to air NBC&#8217;s hilarious and still very-much-alive sitcom <a href="http://www.nbc.com/Scrubs/" title="Visit the Official Web Site for Scrubs"><i>Scrubs</i></a>.  Already renewed for a sixth season, currently slated to begin in 2007, on the alphabetical network, the half-hour ensemble follows the misadventures of assorted medical professionals at the fictional teaching hospital Sacred Heart.</p>

<p>The popular, critically acclaimed series is famous for its zany tone and whimsically whacky scenarios&#8212;often featuring lead actor and now movie star, Zach Braff&#8212;in addition to frequent cameos by thespians of note from both film and television.  As of Monday, September 18, Comedy Central plans to broadcast the show in two-episode blocks, five weekday nights per week, starting at 7pm EST.  If you miss the evening editions, however, never fear, because as with most basic-cable fare, numerous repeats are also scheduled throughout the weekends and wee-morning hours.</p>

<p class="credits"><i>Scrubs</i> photo courtesy of NBC and Paul Drinkwater</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvjots.com/scrubs-fans-rejoice/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TVScores for the Fall 2006 Season</title>
		<link>http://tvjots.com/tvscores-for-fall-2006-season/</link>
		<comments>http://tvjots.com/tvscores-for-fall-2006-season/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 18:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chandra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer 2006]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TV Scores]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvjots.com/wordpress/tvscores-for-the-fall-2006-season/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Although Fox has been getting its groove on since the end of August, the week beginning Monday, September 18 is when the remaining U.S. television stations will finally bum-rush the Fall 2006 season with a slew of new shows that, in my opinion, seem generally more interesting and worth the time investment than in TV [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="excerpt">
<p>Although Fox has been getting its groove on since the end of August, the week beginning Monday, September 18 is when the remaining U.S. television stations will finally bum-rush the Fall 2006 season with a slew of new shows that, in my opinion, seem generally more interesting and worth the time investment than in TV seasons past.</p>

<p>And in a new trend that has grown increasingly more prevalent in recent years, there will be tons of film stars around trying to make their mark on the small screen, as well, most notably including Academy Award nominees James Woods and Virginia Madsen and Emmy winner Ray Liotta in the rookie legal and crime dramas <i>Shark</i> (Woods) and <i>Smith</i> (Liotta and Madsen).  I predict lots of pleasant (re)viewing ahead.</p>

<div class="remainder">
<p>As the season progresses, I will revisit this list regularly to revise my grades and weigh in on additional programs.  Keep up-to-date with me by simply clicking the link for TVScores Fall 2006, found under Score Stuff in the righthand sidebar.</p>

<div class="navPage">
  <p>Page Navigation</p>
  <ul>
    <li>A</li>
    <li><a href="#b" title="Shows Starting with B">B</a></li>
    <li><a href="#c" title="Shows Starting with C">C</a></li>
    <li>D</li>
    <li>E</li>
    <li>F</li>
    <li>G</li>
    <li><a href="#h" title="Shows Starting with H">H</a></li>
    <li><a href="#i" title="Shows Starting with I">I</a></li>
    <li><a href="#j" title="Shows Starting with J">J</a></li>
    <li>K</li>
    <li>L</li>
    <li><a href="#m" title="Shows Starting with M">M</a></li>
    <li>N</li>
    <li>O</li>
    <li><a href="#p" title="Shows Starting with P">P</a></li>
    <li>Q</li>
    <li>R</li>
    <li><a href="#s" title="Shows Starting with S">S</a></li>
    <li><a href="#t" title="Shows Starting with T">T</a></li>
    <li>U</li>
    <li><a href="#v" title="Shows Starting with V">V</a></li>
    <li>W</li>
    <li>X</li>
    <li>Y</li>
    <li>Z</li>
  </ul>
</div>

<div class="scores">
<a id="b"></a>
<h5>Bones</h5>
<p>A-&#160;The squints are back with a brand new boss and still rockin&#8217; the evidence.  Go team!</p>

<a id="c"></a>
<h5>Celebrity Duets</h5>
<p>C&#160;Once you&#8217;ve seen the stars sing one time, most of whom sound okay, I can&#8217;t imagine coming back to see anymore (except for maybe <i>Queer Eye</i>&#8216;s Jai Rodriguez, who rocked the house with Gladys Knight in his first standing-ovation-worthy performance).  All three judges are too nice, and it&#8217;s really hard to get worked up over celebrities who&#8217;ve obviously been singing for a long time, even if it was only in private and/or in the shower.</p>

<a id="h"></a>
<h5>Happy Hour</h5>
<p>F&#160;Oh, those sly TV execs and their silly language games! <i>Happy Hour</i> really means &#8220;Sad (as in pathetically unfunny) half-hour.&#8221;</p>

<h5>House</h5>
<p>A-&#160;Doc House is back in the house, and although his pain may appear to be gone&#8212;for now, thanks to that mysterious coma-and-Ketamine treatment sneaky Cuddy and Wilson slipped over on him&#8212;his &#8216;tude definitely is <em>not</em>.</p>

<a id="i"></a>
<h5>The Inspector Lynley Mysteries, Series V</h5>
<p>B+&#160;Their relationship is noticeably tamer now that Inspector Lynley and Sergeant Havers have learned to like and respect one another, but the same old convoluted and intriguing crimes viewers are accustomed to keep the atmosphere on the dark and spicy side nonetheless.</p>

<a id="j"></a>
<h5>Justice</h5>
<p>A-&#160;Pay attention or&#8212;whew!&#8212;you might miss it.  This new legal/crime drama starring <i>Alias</i>&#8216; Daddy Bristow himself, Victor Garber, is fast-paced, visually arresting, and <em>so</em> entertaining.  Thanks, Fox.</p>

<a id="m"></a>
<h5>MI-5</h5>
<p>A-&#160;Though still a tad predictable in its fourth season, and now with only one main character left over from the 2002 debut season, this British espionage drama with a modern, global perspective remains breathtakingly thrilling, intriguing, smart, and fast-paced.  It&#8217;s like an updated <i>Mission: Impossible</i> for those who find traditional British crime dramas too stuffy for prime time.  My only gripe: I wish the show went by the much snazzier name <i>Spooks</i> here in the United States, like it does in the United Kingdom.</p>

<h5>Men in Trees</h5>
<p>B&#160;Men may indeed be up in the trees in remote Elmo, Alaska&#8212;the setting of ABC&#8217;s new dramedy starring Anne Heche&#8212;but will viewers be in attendance to watch the quirky romance show on historically low-rated Friday nights?  Or will the ratings be small-town sized?  The latter seems more likely than the former.</p>

<h5>Midnight Money Madness</h5>
<p>D&#160;The opportunity to win hundreds of dollars in cold hard cash aside, this show&#8217;s set is so garish, the hosts so irritating, and the questions so dumb, it almost makes my eyes <em>and</em> ears bleed.  Definitely not something I could watch for more than ten or fifteen minutes at a time.  (And doesn&#8217;t that ploy where you have to pay 99 cents for each attempt to win seem hinky?&#8212;there&#8217;s no guarantee you&#8217;ll get through, which the hosts readily admit, but they have no problem taking another dollar from you for multiple calls and text messages.  I can just see some poor, lonely schmuck falling for that gimmick and charging up hundreds of dollars in no time while trying to cash out.)</p>

<h5>Million Dollar Listing</h5>
<p>D&#160;If you&#8217;re an aspiring real-estate agent, a real-estate groupie, or have always dreamed of living in Malibu or Hollywood, California, watch to your heart&#8217;s content.  Otherwise, this clunker might be a waste of your precious time that you&#8217;ll deeply regret never ever being able to get back.</p>

<a id="p"></a>
<h5>Prison Break</h5>
<p>A-&#160;So far, so good in jailbird land.</p>

<a id="s"></a>
<h5>Standoff</h5>
<p>B+&#160;Two A-list FBI crisis negotiators partner both on and off the job, with frequently funny results&#8212;not must-see TV for me, but nice lightweight entertainment nonetheless.</p>

<a id="t"></a>
<h5>&#8216;Til Death</h5>
<p>B+&#160;<i>Everybody Loves Raymond</i>&#8216;s Emmy-winning brother Brad Garrett returns to sitcoms, not in the highly anticipated and touted spinoff of the popular series, but a new half-hour piece that offers a humorous comparison and contrast of married life for newlyweds and old pros.  It&#8217;s very watchable, sometimes realistic, and often funny.</p>

<a id="v"></a>
<h5>Vanished</h5>
<p>C&#160;Why, oh, why do we need this FBI/missing-person show when <i>Without a Trace</i> is  still running strong?  Capable cast aside, it seems a bit redundant and unnecessary, not to mention nowhere near as gripping as its predecessor.</p>
</div>

</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvjots.com/tvscores-for-fall-2006-season/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Men in Trees: Tiiim-ber!</title>
		<link>http://tvjots.com/men-in-trees-tiiim-ber/</link>
		<comments>http://tvjots.com/men-in-trees-tiiim-ber/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2006 17:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chandra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Men in Trees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dramedy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer 2006]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvjots.com/wordpress/men-in-trees-tiiim-ber/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anne Heche Goes Tree Chopping Poor Anne Heche. After all of these years and all the acting work she has done since, and notwithstanding her excellent former stint as the bewitching twins Marley and Vicky Hudson on the long-departed daytime soap opera Another World, I still think of her first and foremost as comedian and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="excerpt">
<h4>Anne Heche Goes Tree Chopping</h4>

<p><img class="right" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger2/8071/3646/200/men_in_trees.jpg" alt="Men in Trees" />
Poor Anne Heche.  After all of these years and all the acting work she has done since, and notwithstanding her excellent former stint as the bewitching twins Marley and Vicky Hudson on the long-departed daytime soap opera <i>Another World</i>, I still think of her first and foremost as comedian and talk show host Ellen DeGeneres&#8217; ex.  That just goes to show how tightly entwined an actor&#8217;s personal and professional lives can be.  It also may explain why, despite the general okay-ness of Heche&#8217;s new hour-long comedy drama on ABC, <a href="http://abc.go.com/primetime/menintrees/index.html" title="Visit the Official Web Site for Men in Trees"><i>Men in Trees</i></a>, she&#8217;s just not viable in the lead role of relationship coach and bestselling author Marin Frist.</p>

<div class="remainder">
<p>Instead of suspending my disbelief in order to &#8220;buy&#8221; Heche as Frist, someone whose career success is 100 percent dependent upon her ability to accurately analyze the dynamics of male-female interactions, I found myself simply nitpicking the details of her performance that confirmed my prior belief that Heche probably knows as little about making a romantic relationship work as the next person, if not less.  Why ABC execs didn&#8217;t see such a state of affairs coming is anyone&#8217;s best guess, but somebody in their ranks should have at least understood beforehand why Heche might have been miscast in the starring role.</p>

<p>The pilot of <i>Men in Trees</i> introduces the Frist character as a popular author of relationship advice books that focus on empowering women to take the lead in their own lives by becoming less reliant on men to supply the direction, stability, and happiness they crave.  Her witty refrains and quotable prose lose quite a bit of their effectiveness after Frist, on her way to a remote <i>Northern Exposure</i>-ish town in Alaska to promote her second publication while in the midst of eager wedding plans, inadvertently discovers that her fianc&#233; is cheating on her with another woman she knows.</p>

<p>There goes the wedding, of course, because a woman who tells other people how to conduct their relationships for a living cannot possibly walk down the aisle when she couldn&#8217;t even foresee the troubles in her own personal life. To make matters worse, Frist&#8217;s Alaskan destination turns out to be a man hunter&#8217;s mecca, with ten men for every one woman&#8212;exactly what she <em>doesn&#8217;t</em> need after her most recent marriage disappointment.  The irony is not lost on our heroine, particularly when it is compounded by her repeated inability to get out of the forsaken place due to a lack of regular, reliable transportation.  Good for her, then, that the she eventually succumbs to the sheer beauty of the back-to-nature surroundings and decides to stay for a time among the town&#8217;s quirky denizens, mostly men though they are.</p>

<p>Whether audiences will likewise stick around for <i>Men in Trees</i> is another question all together.  The series debuted Tuesday night at 10:02 in a preview slot.  This Friday, a night that historically draws fewer viewers overall, it moves to its regular 9pm slot (after a repeat of the pilot at 8pm).  CBS has had the most success of late in this difficult prime-time period with the one-two-three punch of the supernatural <i>Ghost Whisperer</i>, starring fan favorite Jennifer Love Hewitt, the female-centric legal drama <i>Close to Home</i>, and the hit crime drama <i>Numbers</i>.  As the network&#8217;s lineup amply demonstrates, viewers tend to gravitate more towards shows that deliver a dramatic wallop, when they watch TV on Friday nights at all.  Can a romantic dramedy about a know-it-all giver of advice&#8212;even if she weren&#8217;t portrayed by Heche&#8212;and the peculiar people who inspire her fare well under such circumstances?  Only time and the Nielsen ratings will tell; but unlike men and women trying to make their relationships work, the numbers won&#8217;t lie.</p>

<p>The Verdict: <b>B</b></p>

<p class="nb"><i>Men in Trees</i> currently airs Fridays at 9pm EST on ABC</p>

<p class="credits"><i>Men in Trees</i> photo courtesy of ABC</p>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvjots.com/men-in-trees-tiiim-ber/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>9/11 Five Years Later</title>
		<link>http://tvjots.com/911-five-years-later/</link>
		<comments>http://tvjots.com/911-five-years-later/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Sep 2006 18:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chandra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Films]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer 2006]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvjots.com/wordpress/911-five-years-later/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This week marks the fifth anniversary of September 11, 2001. In addition to the numerous commemorative events taking place all over the United States and the world, I also very highly recommend watching the disarmingly realistic and moving 2006 movie United 93, which was just released on DVD last Tuesday, and/or The Path to 9/11, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fullpost">
<p><img class="left" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger2/8071/3646/200/world_trade_center_tribute.jpg" alt="World Trade Center Light Tribute" />
This week marks the fifth anniversary of September 11, 2001.  In addition to the numerous commemorative events taking place all over the United States and the world, I also very highly recommend watching the disarmingly realistic and moving 2006 movie <a href="http://www.united93movie.com/" title="Visit the Official Web Site for United 93"><i>United 93</i></a>, which was just released on DVD last Tuesday, and/or <a href="http://abc.go.com/movies/thepathto911/index.html" title="Visit the Official Web Site for The Path to 9/11"><i>The Path to 9/11</i></a>, the two-part ABC mini-series&#8212;based partially on the 9/11 Commission Report&#8212;that concludes tonight.  Both films offer a cutting overview of the historic event with a welcome absence of unnecessary melodrama.  Never forget indeed.</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvjots.com/911-five-years-later/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Inspector Lynley Returns to PBS&#8217; Mystery! Powerhouse</title>
		<link>http://tvjots.com/inspector-lynley-returns-to-pbs-mystery/</link>
		<comments>http://tvjots.com/inspector-lynley-returns-to-pbs-mystery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Sep 2006 16:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chandra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Jots]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer 2006]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvjots.com/wordpress/inspector-lynley-returns-to-pbs-mystery-powerhouse/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mystery! Rocks On with Scotland Yard&#8217;s Dynamic Dueling Duo, Inspector Thomas Lynley and Sergeant Barbara Havers PBS&#8217; adult dramatic programming has a certain snobbish reputation in the United States that probably repels more potential viewers than it attracts. What a shame, though, because some of the best crime series on American television are not Yankee-style [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="excerpt">
<h4><i>Mystery!</i> Rocks On with Scotland Yard&#8217;s Dynamic Dueling Duo, Inspector Thomas Lynley and Sergeant Barbara Havers</h4>

<p><img class="right" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger2/8071/3646/200/inspector_lynley.jpg" alt="Inspector Lynley Mysteries" />
PBS&#8217; adult dramatic programming has a certain snobbish reputation in the United States that probably repels more potential viewers than it attracts.  What a shame, though, because some of the best crime series on American television are not Yankee-style procedurals in the vein of <i>Law &#038; Order</i> and <i>CSI</i>, but rather British imports, most based on serial suspense novels, that appear on public stations as part of the long-running and venerable <i>Mystery!</i> series.</p>

<div class="remainder">
<p>Nothing is better than the ability to watch such quality and highly interesting detective shows for free, as opposed to shelling out extra dough for cable channel BBC America, which airs similar fare sporadically.  So while everyone else who follows television is getting excited about the slew of fall shows debuting or returning in the following weeks, yours truly is beside herself with joy over the latest four installments of the compelling <a href="http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/mystery/lynley/index.html" title="Visit the Official PBS Web Site for the Inspector Lynley Mysteries"><i>Inspector Lynley Mysteries</i></a> beginning on PBS tonight.  It sure is going to be good reuniting with dapper Detective Inspector Thomas Lynley (Nathaniel Parker) and his headstrong partner, Detective Sergeant Barbara Havers (Sharon Small).</p>

<p>The <i>Inspector Lynley Mysteries</i>, adapted from the bestselling novels of American author Elizabeth George, follow the personal and professional circumstances of Inspector Lynley and Sergeant Havers as they solve crimes out of Scotland Yard.  Their relationship is an often contentious affair that has matured and strengthened somewhat over the years, despite their extremely different backgrounds and frequent antagonistic disagreements.  Lynley is a man of good breeding, in the classic British nobility sense (he&#8217;s the eighth Earl of Asherton), while Havers is unmistakably working class in every respect, from her demeanor to her outlook.  Originally partnered because no one else wanted to work with either of them, the two could not be more distinct yet still oddly alike.</p>

<p>The end of the previous season saw Havers&#8217; career in jeopardy after she was shot on the job and Lynley facing separation not only from his partner, but his longtime love and wife, Helen (Emma Fielding), as well.  Fresh tales of intrigue will explore the ramifications of those developments as the newest four 90-minute, commercial-free episodes, all of which originally aired in the United Kingdom during March and April 2005, unfold on four consecutive Sundays, from September 10 to October 1.  If you already identify as a fan of British detective shows or simply seek a change of pace in your viewing habits, the forthcoming <i>Inspector Lynley Mysteries</i> could very well be just the type of must-see TV you need.</p>

<h5>Schedule*</h5>
<ul>
  <li>Sunday, September 10: In Divine Proportion</li>
  <li>Sunday, September 17: In the Guise of Death</li>
  <li>Sunday, September 24: The Seed of Cunning</li>
  <li>Sunday, October 1: The Word of God</li>
</ul>

<p class="nb">*All PBS times may vary&#8212;Check your local listings to verify them</p>

<p class="credits"><i>Inspector Lynley Mysteries</i> photo courtesy of the BBC</p>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvjots.com/inspector-lynley-returns-to-pbs-mystery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Desire and Fashion House: Telenovela TV</title>
		<link>http://tvjots.com/desire-and-fashion-house-telenovela-tv/</link>
		<comments>http://tvjots.com/desire-and-fashion-house-telenovela-tv/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2006 20:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chandra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soap Operas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer 2006]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvjots.com/wordpress/desire-and-fashion-house-telenovela-tv/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nighttime Is the Right Time for Soaps American TV viewers who don&#8217;t tune into Spanish-language stations like Telemundo and Univision are probably unaware of the wildly popular prime-time soap operas on similar channels called telenovelas. These serialized nighttime programs are in fact the most popular type of show in the world, even more watched than [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="excerpt">
<h4>Nighttime Is the Right Time for Soaps</h4>

<p>American TV viewers who don&#8217;t tune into Spanish-language stations like Telemundo and Univision are probably unaware of the wildly popular prime-time soap operas on similar channels called telenovelas.  These serialized nighttime programs are in fact the most popular type of show in the world, even more watched than such customary staples as game shows, reality series, and <i>Law &#38; Order</i>-style crime procedurals.  The brains behind the fledgling MyNetworkTV, a new station and Fox affiliate in some markets deprived of a network after The WB and UPN merged, recognized an interesting prospect when they saw it, and they made the daring decision to rely exclusively on the telenovela format during prime time from the very beginning of the station&#8217;s official launch, which occurred Tuesday, September 5.</p>

<div class="remainder">
<p>As a result, MyNetworkTV is currently offering two prime-time soap operas with a distinctly novela twist&#8212;defined by a plot with a distinct beginning, middle, and end (not the open-ended, ongoing storylines that American soaps have historically had), they will air six nights a week over the course of thirteen weeks, with no repeats (except for same-night replays in some markets), for a total of 65 sudsy episodes, not counting the hour-long Saturday weekly recaps.  And when they finish in December, two new titles will immediately follow: <i>Art of Betrayal</i>, starring <i>Rescue Me</i>&#8216;s Tatum O&#8217;Neal, and <i>Watch Over Me</i>, with Catherine Oxenberg, Casper Van Dien, and former Miss Universe Dayanara Torres.  Both of the present series are based on previous Spanish-language telenovelas, as well: <a href="http://www.mynetworktv.com/desire.html" title="Visit the Official Web Site for Desire"><i>Desire</i></a> is adapted from Colombia&#8217;s <i>Mesa para tres</i> (Table for Three) and <a href="http://www.mynetworktv.com/fh.html" title="Visit the Official Web Site for Fashion House"><i>Fashion House</i></a> from <i>Salir de noche</i> (Out in the Night), a popular telenovela two decades ago.</p>

<p><img class="left" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger2/8071/3646/200/desire.jpg" alt="Desire" />
The first of the two debut soaps is <i>Desire</i>, an unexpectedly interesting treat about the young, good-looking (of course!) Thomas brothers, chef Alex (Zack Silva) and manager Louis (Nate Haden), who both work in the restaurant business and both fall in love with the same woman.  The opening scenes in New Jersey introduce them near the opening of their own restaurant.   Deceptively clean-cut older brother Louis, who looks like a well-mannered businessman, makes the deadly decision to bed the nubile daughter of a Mafioso (Chris DeRose) hellbent on maintaining her good reputation.  When the gangster learns from his henchmen that the two are together one night, things get dangerous quickly, forcing the brothers to flee to California with their mother (Eliana Alexander) after their restaurant is burned down.  There, they begin working in another upscale food establishment where, unbeknownst to them, their father is also employed.  They each stumble upon the owner&#8217;s pretty and independent daughter, Andrea Zavatti (Michelle Belegrin), during their first day on the job helping out at her birthday party and immediately declare their love.</p>

<p>What most makes <i>Desire</i> appealing is the natural, melodrama-free performances of the three lead actors, Belegrin, Haden, and Silva, in addition to the sense of urgency imparted by the fact that the Mafia man back in New Jersey not only knows the Thomas family survived the restaurant fire, but now believes that Louis raped his daughter after she lied to protect herself from his rabid anger.  Another asset is the presence of <i>CSI: Miami</i> alumna Sofia Milos (she played Detective Yelina Salas, the wife of Horatio Caine&#8217;s absent brother, from 2003 to 2005) as the scheming sister of Andrea&#8217;s scheming ex-boyfriend.  How the story will unfold is truly anyone&#8217;s best guess, and if I had the time and urge to watch a daily soap opera, whether daytime or prime time, this one would definitely be it.</p>

<p><img class="right" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger2/8071/3646/200/fashion_house.jpg" alt="Fashion House" />
<i>Fashion House</i> initially seems to have two things going for it, as well&#8212;namely, the headliners, Bo Derek and Morgan Fairchild.  Yet, in spite of Derek&#8217;s definitive presence in the premiere episode, the show never came anywhere near the compelling level of <i>Desire</i>.  A large part of the problem is that, with the exception of model-actress Natalie Martinez&#8217; engaging portrayal of the talented-but-desperate housewife Michelle Miller, who is married to an overbearing, cheating accountant named Lance (Mike Begovich), the acting and plotlines in the soap seem more tailored to cheesiness than provocativeness.</p>

<p>Derek plays Maria Gianni, the no-nonsense matriarch of Gianni, Inc., a well-known and seemingly successful fashion company.  As we learn over the course of the first episode, however, things aren&#8217;t as rosy in her business as she would have others believe.  Aside from financial problems, she has to cope with an unproductive artist son, Luke (Taylor Kinney), and a conniving blackmailer threatening to steal her business right from under her.  Fairchild was absent from the premiere, but will make her grand entrance later as a bitter rival who is comparably ruthless and&#8212;dare I say?&#8212;bitchy.</p>

<p>Filled with familiar clich&#233;d dialogue along the lines of &#8220;You&#8217;re such a bitch/Takes one to know one,&#8221; and with the promise of scores of petulant face slaps hanging tackily in the air, <i>Fashion House</i> comes across as downright corny and amateurish in comparison to <i>Desire</i> &#8230; and most other soaps.  All is good if you like your sudsers high on the immature froth and low on the adult drama, but I&#8217;ll take <i>Desire</i> over <i>Fashion House</i> any day, divas be damned.</p>

<p>The Verdict: <i>Desire</i> gets a <b>B</b> for actually being interesting, while <i>Fashion House</i> merits a <b>C</b>, despite the welcome presence of Natalie Martinez</p>

<p class="nb"><i>Desire</i> currently airs Monday through Friday at 8pm EST and <i>Fashion House</i> at 9pm EST on MyNetworkTV, with weekly recaps on Saturday at the same times</p>

<p class="credits"><i>Desire</i> and <i>Fashion House</i> photos courtesy of MyNetworkTV</p>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvjots.com/desire-and-fashion-house-telenovela-tv/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Steve Irwin, R.I.P.</title>
		<link>http://tvjots.com/steve-irwin-rip/</link>
		<comments>http://tvjots.com/steve-irwin-rip/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2006 18:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chandra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[R.I.P.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer 2006]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvjots.com/wordpress/steve-irwin-rip/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The big news around entertainment land today is the thoroughly unexpected story that 44-year-old Crocodile Hunter Steve Irwin passed away this morning around 11am Australian time while filming a documentary about stingrays off the coast of Australia. The incident on the Great Barrier Reef reportedly occurred when Irwin unintentionally threatened a stingray after he swam [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="fullpost">
<p><img class="left" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger2/8071/3646/200/steve_irwin_family.jpg" alt="Steve Irwin and Family" />
The big news around entertainment land today is the thoroughly unexpected story that 44-year-old <a href="http://animal.discovery.com/fansites/crochunter/crochunter.html" title="Visit the Official Web Site for The Crocodile Hunter"><i>Crocodile Hunter</i></a> Steve Irwin passed away this morning around 11am Australian time while filming a documentary about stingrays off the coast of Australia.  The incident on the Great Barrier Reef reportedly occurred when Irwin unintentionally threatened a stingray after he swam over it, causing the fish to shoot up its poisonous barbed tail in a reflexive defensive reaction and pierce Irwin in the chest.  According to details released thus far, he died instantly.</p>

<p>It&#8217;s always unfortunate when someone&#8217;s life ends.  Yet, I have to say, for a rare individual who loved getting <em>very</em> up close and <em>very</em> personal with dangerous creatures in their natural habitats, there couldn&#8217;t be a more unique way to exit this world: stung in the chest by a stingray.  Read more about Irwin and his untimely passing at <a href="http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1531446,00.html" title="Read 'Death of a Crocodile Hunter'">Time</a>.</p>

<p class="credits">Steve Irwin and family photo courtesy of Animal Planet</p>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvjots.com/steve-irwin-rip/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vanished: And When It Is, Will Anyone Care?</title>
		<link>http://tvjots.com/vanished-and-when-it-is-will-anyone/</link>
		<comments>http://tvjots.com/vanished-and-when-it-is-will-anyone/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Sep 2006 04:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chandra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Drama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer 2006]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvjots.com/wordpress/vanished-and-when-it-is-will-anyone-care/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Without a Trace XXX Lite Comes to Fox I&#8217;ll keep this short and sweet like it should be: judging from its first two episodes, Fox&#8217;s new missing-persons series Vanished has nothing to offer that viewers can&#8217;t already get from CBS&#8217; far superior FBI procedural Without a Trace. This observation is only to be expected in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="excerpt">
<h4><i>Without a Trace XXX Lite</i> Comes to Fox</h4>

<p><img class="right" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger2/8071/3646/200/vanished.jpg" alt="Vanished" />
I&#8217;ll keep this short and sweet like it should be: judging from its first two episodes, Fox&#8217;s new missing-persons series <a href="http://www.fox.com/vanished/" title="Visit the Official Web Site for Vanished"><i>Vanished</i></a> has nothing to offer that viewers can&#8217;t already get from CBS&#8217; far superior FBI procedural <i>Without a Trace</i>.  This observation is only to be expected in some ways since the shows are inextricably linked.  In 2002, word spread that a forthcoming serial program named <i>Vanished</i> concerned the missing-persons division of the FBI and would star Anthony LaPaglia.  CBS eventually bought the series, renamed it <i>Without a Trace</i>, and the rest, as they say, is history.  The current <i>Vanished</i> remains distinguished by its creator, Josh Berman, the former co-executive producer of and a writer for TV&#8217;s highest-rated series, <i>CSI: Crime Scene Investigation</i>.  I wonder if he&#8217;s feeling regret yet for not staying with that popular, high-profile program.</p>

<div class="remainder">
<p>The Fox show&#8217;s setup is devised to be deceptively simple in order to hook viewers with the complex developments necessary to stretch the thin plot out for an entire season.  The basic storyline concerns Sara Collins (Joanne Kelly), the pretty, young, do-gooder second wife of Georgia Senator Jeffrey Collins (John Allen Nelson), who goes missing from the hotel benefit being held in her honor to recognize her charitable work for education.  In full view of anyone who bothers to look, including her husband, Sara is escorted from her table by a goateed concierge who claims she has an urgent call on the house telephone.  The senator soon realizes his wife has not returned and starts looking for her, at which time an actual hotel employee reveals that facial hair is banned among staff.  This is among the first of several very obvious clues that something hinky is underway.</p>

<p>The FBI is then immediately summoned to investigate because senators and other politicians are very important people, of course.  Flashbacks provide a bit of crucial background on the lead agent, Graham Kelton (Gale Harold, <i>Deadwood</i>&#8216;s Wyatt Earp), an adept and serious investigator who nonetheless found himself the target of negative scrutiny after the kidnapping of a 12-year-old boy went horrifically wrong, leading to the literal blowing up of the child.  If the series had focused on this truly interesting case and made Sara Collins&#8217; humdrum disappearance the backstory instead, <i>Vanished</i> would be much more appealing.</p>

<p>As it is, we meet the various additional players one by one, in assorted scenarios that are supposed to establish definitive identities for the characters, but actually only reveal how cookie-cutter and vapid most of them are, especially when it comes to the vanished subject herself and every other member of the senator&#8217;s family.  For instance, who&#8217;s surprised that one of the senator&#8217;s children is involved with someone from the wrong side of the tracks who might be involved in Sara Collins&#8217; disappearance?  What would be really amazing is if this type of formulaic character did <em>not</em> figure in the plot.</p>

<p>No matter how perpetually underused, it&#8217;s always nice to see Ming-Na (<i>ER</i>), who plays Lin Mei, Kelton&#8217;s equally capable partner.  Rebecca Gayheart (<i>Dead Like Me</i>) also does a good job as the intentionally irritating, eager-beaver reporter Judy Nash.  The same, however, cannot be said of any of the actors who portray the senator&#8217;s family members, all of whom come across as dull, generic, and stereotypical relatives of a crime victim slyly trying to hide buried secrets from prying eyes.  How many times have we seen similar deceitful behavior on television before?  Too many times to count, and there&#8217;s no drama or suspense in it anywhere here.</p>

<p>Viewers who chose to continue watching are promised more obtuse mysteries along the way that are supposed to ultimately disclose all kinds of conspiracies and shenanigans, such as the predictable possibility that Sara Collins may not even be Sara Collins.  The ride shouldn&#8217;t be too painful given the large amount of acting talent in the cast, ranging from film actress Penelope Ann Miller as the senator&#8217;s suspicious ex-wife (hopefully, she&#8217;ll add some much-needed zest to the boring senator subplot) to TV veterans Esai Morales (<i>NYPD Blue</i>) and Eddie Cibrian (<i>Invasion</i>, <i>Third Watch</i>) as fellow FBI agents.  I wish <i>Vanished</i> well attempting to cultivate a successful full-season series out of what has aired thus far, but the material in the initial two episodes doesn&#8217;t engender much optimism.</p>

<p>The Verdict: <b>C</b></p>

<p class="nb"><i>Vanished</i> currently airs Mondays at 9pm EST on Fox</p>

<p class="credits"><i>Vanished</i> photo courtesy of Fox and Frank Ockenfels</p>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvjots.com/vanished-and-when-it-is-will-anyone/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Million Dollar Listing: Hard Sell in a Bull Reality Market</title>
		<link>http://tvjots.com/million-dollar-listing-hard-sell-in/</link>
		<comments>http://tvjots.com/million-dollar-listing-hard-sell-in/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 16:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chandra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reality TV]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer 2006]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvjots.com/wordpress/million-dollar-listing-hard-sell-in-a-bull-reality-market/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just What the World Needs&#8212;Yet Another TV Show about Rich People and Their Expensive Possessions I cannot believe that I&#8217;ve wasted an entire hour of my life that I can never get back watching Bravo&#8217;s new luxury-real-estate reality series, Million Dollar Listing, but I did, and now I must write about it. The premise of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="excerpt">
<h4>Just What the World Needs&#8212;Yet Another TV Show about Rich People and Their Expensive Possessions</h4>

<p><img class="left" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger2/8071/3646/200/million_dollar_listing_original.jpg" alt="Million Dollar Listing" />
I cannot believe that I&#8217;ve wasted an entire hour of my life that I can never get back watching Bravo&#8217;s new luxury-real-estate reality series, <a href="http://www.bravotv.com/Million_Dollar_Listing//index.shtml" title="Visit the Official Web Site for Million Dollar Listing"><i>Million Dollar Listing</i></a>, but I did, and now I must write about it.  The premise of the show is to give viewers a rare opportunity to witness the sale of a &#8220;hot,&#8221; expensive piece of property from the moment it goes on sale until its purchase is closed.  Although numerous California-based real-estate agents  who specialize in upscale property will get their turn in the spotlight over the course of the six-part series, the pilot focuses on two, Malibu&#8217;s 25-year-old wunderkind, Madison Hildebrand, and Hollywood&#8217;s high-maintenance human Barbie doll, Shannon McLeod.</p>

<div class="remainder">
<p>In the premiere episode, viewers are introduced to each as they ply their trade and attempt to make thousands of dollars in commission on the sale of a single home.  Both encounter several obstacles along the way that endanger their efforts, thereby giving rise to what would normally be called dramatic tension if only the audience cared what happened one way or the other.  Hildebrand experiences the pangs of representing a seller who decides to accept a second deal after a prior preliminary deal has already been struck with an eager buyer, while McLeod is forced to cope with the tension and potential repercussions&#8212;not the least of which is the loss of a $100,000+ commission&#8212;of representing both the seller (who happens to be her recent and still emotionally-attached ex-fianc&#233;) and the buyer in a real-estate transaction, a practice that is illegal in most states besides California.  Interspersed throughout the scenes are screen tips designed to clarify the significance of certain terms and minutiae that presumably dimwitted viewers would otherwise not comprehend.</p>

<p>Will each homeowner manage to sale their overpriced property that the majority of Americans couldn&#8217;t even afford in their wildest, most demented dreams and make an obscenely large profit?  Does anyone who doesn&#8217;t already have a gazillion bucks in the bank or an equivalent-sized trust fund care?  Aside from the curious incident of the buxom broad who shows up at McLeod&#8217;s first open house although she and her husband just closed on a house down the street, the premiere episode of <i>Million Dollar Listing</i> doesn&#8217;t even have enough spark to light a cigarette.  Moreover, unlike some so-bad-they&#8217;re-actually-good reality shows, it&#8217;s not enjoyable for the sake of trashiness alone because the main players and the situations we see them in are minimally entertaining, and what little drama emerges is gauze-thin.</p>

<p>Whether or not this series works boils down to one question: would you chose either of the real-estate agents featured to represent you if you had a pricey home in need of selling or if you wanted to buy one?  The answer is an unmistakable, &#8220;No,&#8221; on both counts for me after watching the pilot, and so is my opinion on whether this series is worth anyone&#8217;s but the most diehard real-estate groupie&#8217;s time.</p>

<p>The Verdict: <b>D</b></p>

<p class="nb"><i>Million Dollar Listing</i> currently airs Tuesdays at 9pm EST on Bravo</p>

<p class="credits"><i>Million Dollar Listing</i> photo courtesy of Bravo</p>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvjots.com/million-dollar-listing-hard-sell-in/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Emmys Are Coming! The Emmys Are Coming!</title>
		<link>http://tvjots.com/emmys-are-coming-emmys-are-coming/</link>
		<comments>http://tvjots.com/emmys-are-coming-emmys-are-coming/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chandra</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Awards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Summer 2006]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tvjots.com/wordpress/the-emmys-are-coming-the-emmys-are-coming/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Primetime TV&#8217;s Top Night Finally Arrives Goodness, how time flies. It seems like just yesterday when I was watching the 2006-Emmy-nomination announcements live on NBC&#8217;s Today Show. Now the day of decision has finally arrived, and I haven&#8217;t even made my winner predictions like all self-respecting TV writers are expected to. So, here goes who [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="excerpt">
<h4><img class="right borderless" src="http://photos1.blogger.com/blogger2/8071/3646/320/emmys2_original.gif" alt="58th Annual Primetime Emmy Awards" />
Primetime TV&#8217;s Top Night Finally Arrives</h4>

<p>Goodness, how time flies.  It seems like just yesterday when I was watching the 2006-Emmy-nomination announcements live on NBC&#8217;s Today Show.  Now the day of decision has finally arrived, and I haven&#8217;t even made my winner predictions like all self-respecting TV writers are expected to.  So, here goes who I believe should leave Los Angeles&#8217; Shrine Auditorium tonight with a shiny, little, heavy golden statuette clutched tightly in their hand.  But, please, remember&#8212;all of my choices should be taken with a sack of salt since I&#8217;ve only devoted about fifteen minutes of my life to formulating the following &#8220;analyses.&#8221;</p>

<div class="remainder">
<h4>58th Annual Primetime Emmy Awards Picks</h4>

<h5>Outstanding Comedy Series</h5>
<ul>
  <li><i>Arrested Development</i></li>
  <li><i>Curb Your Enthusiasm</i></li>
  <li><i>The Office</i></li>
  <li><i>Scrubs</i></li>
  <li><i>Two and a Half Men</i></li>
    <ul>
      <li>I pick either <i>The Office</i> or <i>Scrubs</i>, both NBC prime offerings, because they make me laugh, goshdarnit!</li>
      <li>They&#8217;ll probably pick <i>Arrested Development</i> because a lot of people seem to think it was given the boot unjustly and deserved both more time and better ratings (the show was an uneven experience for me&#8212;sometimes funny, sometimes ridiculous in a not-good way).</li>
    </ul>
</ul>

<h5>Outstanding Drama Series</h5>
<ul>
  <li><i>24</i></li>
  <li><i>Grey&#8217;s Anatomy</i></li>
  <li><i>House M.D.</i></li>
  <li><i>The Sopranos</i></li>
  <li><i>The West Wing</i></li>
    <ul>
      <li>I pick <i>24</i> because it&#8217;s so darn captivating (but I wouldn&#8217;t mind if misanthropic <i>House M.D.</i> won to get props for its inexplicably non-nominated star, Hugh Laurie).</li>
      <li>They&#8217;ll probably pick the recently departed <i>West Wing</i> for sentimental reasons, which is okay since the series did have a fine final season.</li>
    </ul>
</ul>

<h5>Outstanding Made for Television Movie</h5>
<ul>
  <li><i>Flight 93</i></li>
  <li><i>The Flight That Fought Back</i></li>
  <li><i>The Girl in the Caf&#233;</i></li>
  <li><i>Mrs. Harris</i></li>
  <li><i>Yesterday</i></li>
    <ul>
      <li>The near-native New Yorker in me picks either of the <i>Flight</i> telefilms about United Airlines Flight 93 for obvious reasons.</li>
      <li>They&#8217;ll probably pick one of the <i>Flight</i> telefilms about United Airlines Flight 93 for obvious reasons.</li>
    </ul>
</ul>

<h5>Outstanding Miniseries</h5>
<ul>
  <li><i>Bleak House</i></li>
  <li><i>Elizabeth I</i></li>
  <li><i>Into the West</i></li>
  <li><i>Sleeper Cell</i></li>
    <ul>
      <li>Ouch&#8212;this one is too hard.  I pick <i>Bleak House</i> because my <i>X-Files</i> girl Gillian Anderson was terrific, along with all of her fellow castmates.  I also pick <i>Elizabeth I</i> because Helen Mirren is my favorite actress, and nothing she&#8217;s in can do wrong.  I pick <i>Into the West</i>, too, because the sprawling tale of early America was simply gorgeous.  I pick <i>Sleeper Cell</i>, as well, since the terrorist-next-door theme was downright scary, especially as acted by the sensational cast.</li>
      <li>They&#8217;ll pick one of the ones I pick because all four nominees would make excellent winners.</li>
    </ul>
</ul>

<h5>Outstanding Lead Actor in a Comedy Series</h5>
<ul>
  <li>Steve Carell for <i>The Office</i></li>
  <li>Larry David for <i>Curb Your Enthusiasm</i></li>
  <li>Kevin James for <i>The King of Queens</i></li>
  <li>Tony Shalhoub for <i>Monk</i></li>
  <li>Charlie Sheen for <i>Two and a Half Men</i></li>
    <ul>
      <li>I pick Steve Carell because who can resist a <i>40-Year-Old Virgin</i>?</li>
      <li>They&#8217;ll probably pick either Carell or Tony Shalhoub, but I wouldn&#8217;t be all that surprised if Charlie Sheen scored with the Academy since his dad Martin is in the spotlight, too, with the <i>West Wing</i> nominations.</li>
    </ul>
</ul>

<h5>Outstanding Lead Actor in a Drama Series</h5>
<ul>
  <li>Peter Krause for <i>Six Feet Under</i></li>
  <li>Denis Leary for <i>Rescue Me</i></li>
  <li>Christopher Meloni for <i>Law &#38; Order: Special Victims Unit</i></li>
  <li>Martin Sheen for <i>The West Wing</i></li>
  <li>Kiefer Sutherland for <i>24</i></li>
    <ul>
      <li>Judging by mass popularity alone, <em>you</em> probably say Kiefer Sutherland, but <em>I</em> say Denis Leary, the multi-talented star of the suh-mokin&#8217; <i>Rescue Me</i>.</li>
      <li>They&#8217;ll probably go with the flow and say Sutherland, but wouldn&#8217;t it be cute if Martin Sheen scooped up this one and his boy Charlie the one for Outstanding Lead Actor in a Comedy Series?</li>
    </ul>
</ul>

<h5>Outstanding Lead Actor in a Miniseries or Movie</h5>
<ul>
  <li>Andre Braugher for <i>Thief</i></li>
  <li>Charles Dance for <i>Bleak House</i></li>
  <li>Ben Kingsley for <i>Mrs. Harris</i></li>
  <li>Donald Sutherland for <i>Human Trafficking</i></li>
  <li>Jon Voight for <i>Pope John Paul II</i></li>
    <ul>
      <li>Is there really a choice here?  I pick Andre Braugher because although <i>Thief</i> was canceled, it wasn&#8217;t his fault&#8212;the man has never given a subpar performance.</li>
      <li>They&#8217;ll probably pick Jon Voight because he portrayed the Pope, like, duh.</li>
    </ul>
</ul>

<h5>Outstanding Lead Actress in a Comedy Series</h5>
<ul>
  <li>Stockard Channing for <i>Out of Practice</i></li>
  <li>Jane Kaczmarek for <i>Malcolm in the Middle</i></li>
  <li>Lisa Kudrow for <i>The Comeback</i></li>
  <li>Julia Louis-Dreyfus for <i>The New Adventures of Old Christine</i></li>
  <li>Debra Messing for <i>Will &#38; Grace</i></li>
    <ul>
      <li>If there&#8217;s one category where I really don&#8217;t care who wins, this one is it.  If my life depended on picking someone, anyone, however, I&#8217;d go for Julia Louis-Dreyfus merely because <i>The New Adventures of Old Christine</i> rose above initial so-so reviews to ace the ratings big time.</li>
      <li>They&#8217;ll probably pick Debra Messing because <i>Will &#38; Grace</i> finally went bye-bye after almost a decade <em>or</em> Louis-Dreyfus because of what I just said.</li>
    </ul>
</ul>

<h5>Outstanding Lead Actress in a Drama Series</h5>
<ul>
  <li>Frances Conroy for <i>Six Feet Under</i></li>
  <li>Geena Davis for <i>Commander in Chief</i></li>
  <li>Mariska Hargitay for <i>Law &#38; Order: Special Victims Unit</i></li>
  <li>Allison Janney for <i>The West Wing</i></li>
  <li>Kyra Sedgwick for <i>The Closer</i></li>
    <ul>
      <li>I pick either Mariska Hargitay (she has a slight edge) or Kyra Sedgwick because both of my girls kick major butt on the crime beat.</li>
      <li>They&#8217;ll probably pick Frances Conroy or Allison Janney because long-running, popular canceled series make them all misty-eyed and whatnot.</li>
    </ul>
</ul>

<h5>Outstanding Lead Actress in a Miniseries or Movie</h5>
<ul>
  <li>Gillian Anderson for <i>Bleak House</i></li>
  <li>Kathy Bates for <i>Ambulance Girl</i></li>
  <li>Annette Bening for <i>Mrs. Harris</i></li>
  <li>Judy Davis for <i>A Little Thing Called Murder</i></li>
  <li>Helen Mirren for <i>Elizabeth I</i></li>
    <ul>
      <li>I pick Anderson or Mirren because I enjoyed their performances more than those of the other nominees (also see my comments under Outstanding Miniseries).</li>
      <li>They&#8217;ll probably pick one of the other three because I didn&#8217;t.</li>
    </ul>
</ul>

<h5>Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Comedy Series</h5>
<ul>
  <li>Will Arnett for <i>Arrested Development</i></li>
  <li>Bryan Cranston for <i>Malcolm in the Middle</i></li>
  <li>Jon Cryer for <i>Two and a Half Men</i></li>
  <li>Sean Hayes for <i>Will &#38; Grace</i></li>
  <li>Jeremy Piven for <i>Entourage</i></li>
    <ul>
      <li>I pick Jon Cryer because he cracks &#8230; me &#8230; up in <i>Two and a Half Men</i>.</li>
      <li>They&#8217;ll likely pick Jeremy Piven because he cracks them&#8212;and everyone else who watches it&#8212;up in <i>Entourage</i>.</li>
    </ul>
</ul>

<h5>Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Drama Series</h5>
<ul>
  <li>Alan Alda for <i>The West Wing</i></li>
  <li>Michael Imperioli for <i>The Sopranos</i></li>
  <li>Gregory Itzin for <i>24</i></li>
  <li>Oliver Platt for <i>Huff</i></li>
  <li>William Shatner for <i>Boston Legal</i></li>
    <ul>
      <li>I pick no one for this one because, oddly enough, I really don&#8217;t care who wins.</li>
      <li>They&#8217;ll probably pick Alan Alda, if not William Shatner, to give a nod to another dinosaur of the acting set who graced the small screen during the nominating season.</li>
    </ul>
</ul>

<h5>Outstanding Supporting Actor in a Miniseries or Movie</h5>
<ul>
  <li>Robert Carlyle for <i>Human Trafficking</i></li>
  <li>Clifton Collins Jr. for <i>Thief</i></li>
  <li>Hugh Dancy for <i>Elizabeth I</i></li>
  <li>Jeremy Irons for <i>Elizabeth I</i></li>
  <li>Denis Lawson for <i>Bleak House</i></li>
    <ul>
      <li>Oh, my&#8212;is this the year of the Brits or what (Carlyle and Lawson are Scottish, while Dancy and Irons are English)?  I pick Robert Carlyle because he&#8217;s one of my all-time favorite actors.  Plus, <i>Human Trafficking</i> was unexpectedly all right and schmaltz-free, especially for a Lifetime original telefilm.</li>
      <li>They&#8217;ll probably pick Jeremy Irons or Hugh Dancy because <i>Elizabeth I</i> rocked (so to speak).</li>
    </ul>
</ul>

<h5>Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Comedy Series</h5>
<ul>
  <li>Cheryl Hines for <i>Curb Your Enthusiasm</i></li>
  <li>Megan Mullally for <i>Will &#38; Grace</i></li>
  <li>Elizabeth Perkins for <i>Weeds</i></li>
  <li>Jaime Pressly for <i>My Name Is Earl</i></li>
  <li>Alfre Woodard for <i>Desperate Housewives</i></li>
    <ul>
      <li>Alfre Woodard was in <i>Desperate Housewives</i> last season?  Oh, yeah, right&#8212;for all of two or three scenes.&#8230;  Anyway, this category is a no-brainer: I pick Jaime Pressly because nobody could bring Joy to the world like she does in <i>My Name Is Earl</i>.</li>
      <li>They&#8217;ll pick Pressly, too, if they have any sense.</li>
    </ul>
</ul>

<h5>Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Drama Series</h5>
<ul>
  <li>Candice Bergen for <i>Boston Legal</i></li>
  <li>Blythe Danner for <i>Huff</i></li>
  <li>Sandra Oh for <i>Grey&#8217;s Anatomy</i></li>
  <li>Jean Smart for <i>24</i></li>
  <li>Chandra Wilson for <i>Grey&#8217;s Anatomy</i></li>
    <ul>
      <li>Now, come on&#8212;do I really need to write it out?  I pick Chandra Wilson because <i>Grey&#8217;s Anatomy</i> would definitely not be the same without her larger-than-life presence (girlfriend steals every scene she&#8217;s in, no matter how brief).</li>
      <li>They&#8217;ll probably pick Wilson, or Sandra Oh, if they know what&#8217;s good for their reputation, especially after all of this year&#8217;s nominating glitches and oversights.</li>
    </ul>
</ul>

<h5>Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Miniseries or Movie</h5>
<ul>
  <li>Ellen Burstyn for <i>Mrs. Harris</i></li>
  <li>Shirley Jones for <i>Hidden Places</i></li>
  <li>Cloris Leachman for <i>Mrs. Harris</i></li>
  <li>Kelly Macdonald for <i>The Girl in the CafÃ©</i></li>
  <li>Alfre Woodard for <i>The Water Is Wide</i></li>
    <ul>
      <li>I pick Woodard since she certainly ain&#8217;t gonna win for Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Comedy Series.</li>
      <li>They&#8217;ll probably pick Ellen Burstyn for fourteen seconds of 2006-Emmy infamy.  ;-)  Just teasing.  Actually, they&#8217;ll probably pick Woodard, like me, because it would be kind of hard to justify her being nominated in two different categories, yet walking away with zip.</li>
    </ul>
</ul>

<h5>Outstanding Variety, Music Or Comedy Series</h5>
<ul>
  <li><i>The Colbert Report</i></li>
  <li><i>The Daily Show</i></li>
  <li><i>Late Night with Conan O&#8217;Brien</i></li>
  <li><i>Late Show with David Letterman</i></li>
  <li><i>Real Time with Bill Maher</i></li>
    <ul>
      <li>Ha!  No Leno?  Well, I don&#8217;t care who wins, then, since the one I definitely wouldn&#8217;t want to isn&#8217;t here.</li>
      <li>They&#8217;ll probably pick <i>The Colbert Report</i> or <i>The Daily Show</i> because <i>Daily Show</i> affiliates and alumni are all the rage nowadays.</li>
    </ul>
</ul>

<h5>Outstanding Reality Competition Program</h5>
<ul>
  <li><i>The Amazing Race</i></li>
  <li><i>American Idol: The Search for a Superstar</i></li>
  <li><i>Dancing with the Stars</i></li>
  <li><i>Project Runway</i></li>
  <li><i>Survivor</i></li>
    <ul>
      <li>I pick <i>Project Runway</i> because Heidi Klum and company are so very in.</li>
      <li>They&#8217;ll likely pick one of the other four because they probably don&#8217;t even know where to find basic cable&#8217;s Bravo on the dial.</li>
    </ul>
</ul>

<p class="nb"><i>The 58th Annual Primetime Emmy Awards</i> airs live Sunday, August 27 at 8pm EST on NBC</p>

<p class="credits">Emmy photo courtesy of the Academy of Television Arts &#38; Sciences</p>
</div>
</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tvjots.com/emmys-are-coming-emmys-are-coming/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

